How to Be a Reviewer of a Journal
How to become a reviewer and be a good i
- Why go a reviewer?
- How to be a reviewer?
- How can yous become a proficient reviewer?
- Use objective expertise
- Build your timeliness
- Piece of work on effective commenting
Why become a reviewer?
Peer review is at the heart of loftier-quality publishing. Consider existence a reviewer a fashion to help accelerate your field of interest and provide effective feedback to your young man authors. Due to the huge increase in manuscripts submitted for publication, reviewers are quickly becoming a valuable professional person figures.
If you are an author who benefited from the peer review procedure you should consider getting yourself involved and provide valuable comments to boyfriend authors. You should encounter condign a reviewer every bit a professional person responsibility.
How to exist a reviewer?
Make certain your personal contour page (whether institutional, on LinkedIn, on ORCID, on ResearchGate and other similar services) is kept up to date with your areas of interest and research, making sure you lot add relevant keywords, including your contact details.
How you are invited to review depends largely on the journal, so always look out for guidelines on the journals' website. Some publications require a formal appointment, others welcome an independent approach. In this example, arrive touch on with the editor (or editors) and let them know y'all are willing to help. If y'all are a young researcher, permit senior scientists know y'all are willing to participate in peer reviews, then they can suggest your name; every bit a young trainee, inquire your adviser to involve y'all in peer review under their supervision.
If y'all're ever presented with the opportunity to participate in open up peer review, or other new peer review workflow models, go for it and explore new formats. Open review is designed to increase transparency in peer review and requite power back to the community by opening up an otherwise airtight procedure.
Peer review is often considered an unpaid bookish duty. However, it is too a great way to continue up-to-date with the developments in your field and allows you to exist an role player in your community. In any case, peer reviewing requires expertise and fourth dimension and, even if you are paid in the typical sense, at that place are means to get visibility and acknowledgement for your piece of work. Explore ways in which you can earn credits for your activity every bit peer reviewer and join all services available today.
How can you become a good reviewer?
Use objective expertise
When y'all are invited to review a manuscript, editors count on your knowledge of a specific topic. The first point to consider, therefore, is that you tin can provide valuable feedback with competence to your boyfriend authors. If you are not familiar with the topic discussed, you should make a point immediately to warning the editor and decline the invitation. Agree to review but if yous have the required expertise to evaluate the piece of work and can be objective and unbiased in your comments.
One time you accept accepted the commitment, dedicate time to it and practice your best to signal out flaws in the manuscript, just also highlight good points. Peer reviewing takes valuable time, so reserve sufficient fourth dimension to create and shape comments which will help authors to ameliorate their work. Peer reviewers are primarily expected to judge the validity of the study, its technical soundness and that claims presented are supported by valid data. Additionally reviewers are asked to evaluate the results and interpretations reported in the paper. Each journal will ascertain what is expected from its reviewers, therefore you should always read the guidelines provided and whatsoever reviewing instructions received.
Build your timeliness
In that location is a very wide understanding that i of the key qualities in peer review is timeliness.
Some authors have been working for months on a peer review fix manuscript so do not keep them waiting longer than necessary and recollect how you would exist eagerly waiting for a review report on your own work…
Unless y'all have time to commit to the peer review, do not accept the task.
Upon invitation, check your pending engagements and reply as presently as possible: this will also clear your inbox. If yous cannot make it, hit the decline link and consider suggesting an alternative colleague for the editor. This will be greatly appreciated past the editor, and especially so from younger journals with a smaller peer reviewers panel. If you take on this new engagement, brand a notation in your agenda nigh deadlines. Journals volition send yous notifications and reminders before your review is due, so try and consider them as a tool to keep you on track, rather than an abrasive ataxia of your inbox…
Should anything crop upwards in your schedule and delay your report, brand sure you inquire for a borderline extension. This volition too help the editors to keep authors up to engagement with the peer review process of their work.
Editors and journals will exist grateful not only by your skilful comments, but also for your understanding of their need to keep a steady manuscript flow.
Piece of work on constructive commenting
The primary purpose of peer review is to ameliorate author'south competence and skills. The main purpose of the peer review process is to provide fair feedback to young man authors. Proceed that at the heart of your review, as the ultimate goal is to make your research field stronger.
Effective feedback has been proven to exist an effective mode to meliorate enquiry, even in case of negative comments or rejections. Always bear in listen that a journal is soliciting your comments for your expertise.
We like to recommend that reviewers should be polite towards the authors and not brand offensive criticism, even in case of really poor work. Their next efforts will greatly do good from your comments., if they are presented in a constructive fashion.
A smashing attention will exist devoted – on your function – of the manuscript presentation and readability. Even so, bear in listen that many authors may write in a second language. You should focus on the contents of the manuscript, rather that its form: information technology is non your job (by and large speaking) to copy-edit a manuscript or correct spelling errors, but pointing out a lacking language is important for the authors.
Suggested readings
A pace-past-step guide to peer review: a template for patients and novice reviewers. BMC Health and Intendance Informatics (2021)
How to Write a Peer Review for a Clinical Case. JACC: case reports (2021)
How to exist a skilful reviewer. The Scholarly kitchen (2019).
What makes a great peer reviewer? Tips from Nature Inquiry editors (2016)
Source: https://www.reviewercredits.com/how-to-become-a-reviewer-and-be-a-good-one/
0 Response to "How to Be a Reviewer of a Journal"
Post a Comment